On CALL (Computer Assisted Language Learning)

This is the first post on this blog, so I would like to maintain it as an introduction to Computer assisted language learning (CALL) and how language teachers and practitioners can harness the power of CALL to enhance language learning.
Most if not all teachers now are called “technology immigrants” since technology was not around in their time when they were learners. Our students, in contrast, are called “technology natives” as they experience technology on a daily basis whether in an educational setting or for personal use. Two things are obvious with regard to our students:

They will know about technology more than we will ever know
They expect their teachers to be knowledgeable in technology

CALL is a part of applied linguistics that is gaining momentum so rapidly as technology changes. Researchers on CALL are increasing as technology is becoming attainable to all ( open source software, internet, web 2.o). Still, many teachers are technophobic since they did not experiment with technology long enough to integrate it into their teaching contexts. Technology can be seen as a tool to enhance learning. So, like any tool, it relies on how a teacher uses this tool to enhance learning. The affordance of technology varies from teaching context to another so teachers should not be afraid to experiment with it. As with course design, teachers can integrate technology successfully based on their creativity.

Language Teachers should exploit technology

based on methodological frameworks and theories of language learning
based on their specific learning context
to enhance language learning
to enhance peripheral learning to language learning , such as autonomy, collaboration, social networking
to enhance their pupils’ critical thinking

The disposition of the teacher to experiment with technology and try it with his/her students to result in innovative language learning setting is worthwhile and the rewards are substantial.
The following posts will discuss CALL and the integration of technology, with its subcategories, multimedia, web 2.0, e-learning, successfully in the language classroom based on methodology and theories of language learning, and especially on reflection on practice.
I hope you find the forthcoming posts valuable and worth reflecting on. More importantly, worth experimenting implementing in your language classroom.
Moreward
Ammar

Comments

Have You Ever Died of PowerPoint Presentations?

Today I had the privilege to attend a so-called workshop on Teacher Anger Management. The presenter holds a PhD in educational psychology and has been conducting workshops and training sessions for many years. What made the workshop unusually tedious and droning was how the presenter used PowerPoint as a tool to replace him. I mean, here is a PhD holder in educational psychology and an experienced teacher trainer, yet he does not have any clue on effective presentation, regardless of the presence of a visual aid such as the PowerPoint. He clearly didn’t have a clue on the basics of multimedia theories and practices. If he had ever read anything in terms of working memory and long term memory and the effect of the verbal and visual channels on the attendees’ minds, he would’ve definitely revamped his presentation and restructured his workshop. At the end of the workshop, teachers said that they learned one important thing from the workshop: Not to use this type of PowerPoi...

Moodle 2 Interactive Tool Guide for Teachers

Moodle has been at the forefront of online learning for learning institutions. And, since it is open source, and free for all, it is common that the community that benefit from Moodle to give back in various ways. One such help comes in Moodle Tool Guide for Teachers. It was first done by Joyce Seitzinger , and then adapted to Moodle 2 by Sue Harper. I have added the feature of interactivity to the guide however. By adding videos to the tool, anyone who wants to learn how to use any tool can just click on the interactive layer and watch the video. I surely hope this helps teachers learn Moodle tools easily and know how each tool affords different learning outcome. I will hopefully later add more interactivity in terms of instructional design, such as Bloom's taxonomy, assessing learning etc.

The 4 E model for Pedagogical Technology

If you look at the image on the left, you will notice the four key components of technology integration, what Collis & moonen (2002) refer to as key components of “flexible learning in a digital world”. The components ( institution, implementation, pedagogy, and technology ) are nested in each other, which means that each depends on and feeds from the other. The approach for the flexible learning can be seen in a top-down, that institution-wide to technological aspect, or in a bottom-up, that is from the technological aspect all the way up to the institution. The 4 E Model as a Guide: Collis & Moonen suggest a 4 E model that will guide anyone who wants to integrate flexible learning in each and all key components E ase of use E nvironment Personal E ngagement E ducational E ffectiveness Now, I will not go into details of the activity-flexibility abstract framework and its U pedagogical approach. All I want to focus on here is how the 4 E model would guide th...

Technology-Enhanced Learning

Search This Blog