Skip to main content

The 4 E model for Pedagogical Technology


If you look at the image on the left, you will notice the four key components of technology integration, what Collis & moonen (2002) refer to as key components of “flexible learning in a digital world”.
The components ( institution, implementation, pedagogy, and technology) are nested in each other, which means that each depends on and feeds from the other. The approach for the flexible learning can be seen in a top-down, that institution-wide to technological aspect, or in  a bottom-up, that is from the technological aspect all the way up to the institution.

The 4 E Model as a Guide:
The Letter E
Collis & Moonen suggest a 4 E model that will guide anyone who wants to integrate flexible learning in each and all key components
Ease of use
Personal Engagement
Educational Effectiveness

Now, I will not go into details of the activity-flexibility abstract framework and its U pedagogical approach. All I want to focus on here is how the 4 E model would guide the teachers in adopting/adapting and using technology in their teaching contexts, be it a complex, core technology such as a CMS ( content-management system) or a complementary technology tool such as PowerPoint, word processor, or a web2.0 tool.

E for Ease of Use:
Jeffrey Veen ...ease of use...
The ease of use of the technology tool can be viewed from the teacher’s and student’s perspective. Is the teacher capable to use the tool with relative ease and exploit it for the students’ benefits? Is the student able to use the tool easily so as to focus on the intended task and not on the tool features?
Are the activities associated with the tool easy to accomplish? Will the students easily work through the activities supported by the tool?
When a teacher decides to use this tool or that (X or Y) he/she should ask the question of : Is the tool easy to use? if not should there be an introductory activity to help students get the hang of it before using it for the subject or course?

E for Environment

End of the Healthcare panel session
Environment is a broad topic and it encompasses the educational institution or organization, the culture or socio-cultural aspect, and everything ( politics…) that affects holistically the adoption and adaption of the pedagogy and technology and the process of implementation.
Key questions such as : How does the educational institution, policy makers, or others in the position of power affect the implementation and use of technology and the associated pedagogy? Does the educational institution the teacher works in support the use of technology to enhance learning? or is he/she a pioneer?
In either case, the teacher who wishes to implement technology to enhance learning should not disregard the effect of the environment on the implementation process and should be keen on what is the best approach to use technology ( in-class access, home access, guided access, self-access…. )

E for personal Engagement
developing the proposal
This E is tightly related to the teacher’s personal and professional engagement with the issue of technology in education and flexible learning as a whole. What drives some teachers to be engaged in technology to enhance learning? Is there any teaching beliefs behind that engagement? One should better gauge his or her beliefs on teaching with technology.

E for Educational Effectiveness
Resusci-Annie's Children Remark On the Effectiveness of the First Amendment
If a teacher decides to use a particular tool for learning and teaching, what is its educational effectiveness? The more the teacher sees that there is educational effectiveness, the more likely the teachers uses that tool. So, the underlying question here is: What is the pedagogical implication of this technological tool when exploited properly? How can technology enhance the learning process that was impossible or improbable before?

I believe that every teacher, administrator, or educational policy maker should be guided by the 4 E model not only in flexible learning but also in all technological pedagogies.
Now all you need to do is to select one tool that you used before with your students and compare it against the 4 E model. Do you think it was worth it using that tool? Do you think it added anything worthwhile to the learning process and outcome?

Reference: Collis & Moonen (2002). Flexible Learning in a Digital World. Routledge

Popular posts from this blog

Edmodo: A Microblogging Educational Platform

I’ve been aware of edmodo for quite a time now though I have never had the chance to use it with my students yet, as the scholastic year did not start yet.
What is Edmodo?
We all know twitter as a social networking platform and a microblogging platform for language learners right!!! The thing is that twitter does not have the security that our students need for safe microblogging. This is where edmodo comes in with its enhanced new features.

Simply put, Edmodo is a microblogging platform for education. You notice this on the home page of edmodo where there you can sign up as a teacher or a student.

Once you enter as a teacher you have to create an account to use edmodo. Your pesonal page contains all the features you need to connect with your students. You can upload assignments with files, link to urls, embed videos, or post a note.
The security in edmodo is that you have to create a group to connect to. Once this is done, you are given a code which in turn you give to your students.…

Emerging Technologies, Key Trends,and Challenges in K- 12 Education

The NMC Horizon 2013 report  came out couple of weeks back with its time-to-adaption of emerging technologies in k-12 education. What New Media Consortium Horizon does is conduct extensive research in the domain of digital learning, and project their probability on the adoption of emerging learning technologies. The report features six technologies with three adoption horizons: 1 year, 2 to 3 years, and 4 to 5 years.The report also includes major trends in the area of digital learning in k-12 education and the major challenges facing education in terms of using technology in education.
Time-to-Adoption for K-12
New-term Horizon (Time-to-adoption 1 year)
Mobile Learning Mobile learning is becoming an essential part in k-12 education. There have already been many initiative programs like the one-to-one and the BYOD programs to help students learn anytime and everywhere. Mobile learning also has more affordance than laptops or PCs for combining the real world and virtual tools in what’s…

No More Text Comments: Giving Voice Feedback on Google Docs

One of the best features of Google Docs is that teachers can comment on students’ essays by highlighting the selected text and giving textual commentary. Students can in turn comment back on their teacher’s comment, making it a great formative feedback for essay writing. It does not only kill the red ink annotations, which are a real annoyance to students, but also targets the intended selection to comment on in an organized manner. However, if teachers want to take formative feedback to new levels of personalized feedback, a voice feedback would be a great solution. This is what Kaizena actually does, and more. Kaizena is a voice commentary online application that integrates fully with Google Drive to maintain the smooth workflow. You don’t even have to go to Kaizena website to install it. It works much like the Google Docs commentary but instead of textual commentary in the highlighted essay section, you include a voice commentary. Kaizena also supports text commentary and highlight…